|
|
 |
|
Inability to take hard decisions |
|
|
|
Theoretically it was the right way to go. The
senior leaders of the ruling coalition sat down
together and discussed the security situation
in the country. Chief of Army Staff Gen Ashfaq
Parvez Kayani briefed the participants about
the measures taken so far to bring peace in
the troubled tribal areas.
The coalition leaders reaffirmed their support
for dialogue, not military force, to deal with
Taliban militants.
They said that they would neither allow militants
to plot attacks on its soil nor let foreign
troops take military action on its territory.
Following the meeting, Federal Information Minister
Sherry Rehman told journalists that the government
aims to create greater national consensus to
fight militancy and a parliamentary debate would
be held to work out a strategy to build consensus.
The coalition partners of the PPP had complained
that the military offensive against militants
in tribal areas was being taken without consulting
and taking them into confidence. Therefore,
the meeting was a ‘democratically correct’
move.
But the outcome of the meeting was utterly disappointing
in context of the security crisis that the country
is facing.
While the ruling coalition was busy trying to
figure out what method of approach should be
adopted towards the militants, another report
made headlines in dailies which said the Mohmand
Agency has come under the “complete control”
of the local Taliban after its cadres eliminated
the leadership of another Jihadi organisation
operating in the area.
Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan commander Umar Khalid
took control of the Mohmand region following
a bloody campaign against the “Shah group”,
whose chief and deputy chief were among eight
persons killed on Friday.
This has made Khalid one of the strongest and
most influential Taliban leaders after Baitullah
Mehsud.
One can determine the growing presence and force
of the Taliban in the tribal areas by this report,
while the ruling coalition is busy deliberating
whether they should talk to the militants or
use force.
Maybe by the time they finally do figure out
how to go about things, it would be too late
to either talk or launch an offensive.
The most avid supporter of negotiating with
militants is JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman.
The PPP is too compelled to take along all such
coalition partners along and in the process
it has become out of touch with its own objectives.
Slain PPP chairwoman Benazir Bhutto had advocated
strict action against militancy and would never
have tolerated leniency towards such elements.
The militants freely roam around burning down
girls’ schools and tourist resorts, and
spreading their terror campaign. The weaknesses
and lack of ability to take hard decisions are
the very reasons that make this coalition government
weak and helpless in making any genuine headway
in any direction.
It wouldn’t require Einstein to figure
out what needs to be done to rescue the country
from the growing threat of militancy. In such
a scenario, trying to develop a national consensus
to fight militancy certainly sounds like a ridiculous
idea.
|
|
|
|
14
July: The story of a popular National Holiday |
|
|
|
In 1880, the Third Republic granted France
a national holiday on 14 July in memory
of the storming of the Bastille on 14
July 1789. This commemoration, which is
intended to unite all French people in
their loyalty to their country, is also
an echo of the Festival of the Federation
on 14 July 1790, a synonym for reconciliation.
The popular festivities it gave rise to
quickly ensured that it would be celebrated
far into the future by the great majority
of people.
On 21 May 1880, Benjamin Raspail, a member
of the French National Assembly in Paris,
put forward the following bill: “That
the Republic should adopt 14 July as an
annual national holiday”. The proposal
was approved by the Chamber of Deputies
on 8 June and ratified by the Senate on
the 29th of the same month. The law was
promulgated on 6 July, and the Minister
of the Interior had already formed a commission
responsible for deciding on the programme
for the day, in order to ensure that the
holiday would have a national flavour
from its very first year. Secular ceremonies
in schools, inaugurations of Republican
statues, distribution of food to the poor,
illuminations, bell-ringing, hoisting
flags and reviewing the troops were therefore
encouraged across France, according to
the good will and budgetary resources
of the municipalities. Indeed, the active
involvement of the army was intended to
bring together all those afflicted by
the loss of Alsace and Lorraine following
the crushing defeat at Sedan, which had
led to the surrender of the French army
to the Prussians in 1870 and the signature
of the Treaty of Frankfurt on 10 May 1871.
Towns with a conservative majority, of
course, grumbled about celebrating a secular,
Republican “ideology” which
their town councillors rejected. Monarchists
and Catholics considered the Revolution
an act of villainy committed against history
and, for them, the day of 14 July 1789
was more of a tragedy than an epic. They
refused to see it as a victory for freedom
and civic emancipation. The triumphal
processions that marched through the streets
of the capital on the evening of the surrender
of the fortress of the Bastille, a symbol
of the arbitrary power of royalty, were
in their eyes just groups of rioters.
Such an attitude, however, was limited
in time and space because of the implicit
reference to 14 July 1790 and the reviews
of troops which made the day a celebration
of the homeland and, by its very nature,
of its opponents. Indeed in May 1878,
a loyal supporter of the Republican Gambetta
affirmed during a speech given to over
four thousand people: “The French
people gave themselves freedom on the
day of 14 July 1789. But when was the
glory of our forefathers greatest? It
was on 14 July 1790 at the Champ-de-Mars.
That was when the French nation was founded.”
The Festival of the Federation on 14 July
1790 had sealed a great movement of brotherhood
in a blaze of glory. The Champ-de-Mars
in Paris had been laid out as a huge amphitheatre,
dominated by the “altar to the homeland”
constructed on a platform, to welcome
a crowd estimated at three hundred thousand,
in addition to the fourteen thousand fédérés
who had come from the provinces to represent
the nation. After mass was celebrated
at the altar, La Fayette, the hero of
the War of Independence in the United
States, took the oath in the name of the
fédérés binding the
French to each other and the French to
their king to defend liberty, the constitution
and the law. Next the king swore, in turn,
to respect the constitution decreed by
the Assembly. In the provinces, this pact
of federation was pronounced in unison
by all citizens, assembled by their municipal
authorities. It was thus in a shared surge
of patriotism that the citizens took their
national holiday to their hearts. National
unity was then no longer just a concept,
but an established fact that several bloody
acts, the most prominent of which was
the execution of Louis XVI in 1793, had
threatened for a number of years.
14 July 1880 was intended to be a celebration
of the upsurge in patriotism in the country,
with the handing over of flags to the
reconstituted regiments, which had been
postponed for several years. The loss
of the standards on the Prussian front
in 1870 had been a traumatic event that
only a highly symbolic celebration could
put right. The primary function of this
first national holiday, which established
allegiance to Marianne as a personification
of the Republic, was to ensure national
unity and re-establish France’s
military power by calling on the collective
memory. Busts of Marianne were inaugurated
in public places, and citizens were able
to buy lithographs from kiosks that represented
her wearing the Phrygian cap (the symbol
of freedom conquered by the people) and
draped with the tricolour or surrounded
by a bundle of flags (the symbol of a
triumphant nation).
Patriotic elation based on shared hopes
was quickly coupled with the exhilaration
of the gatherings in the brightly lit
streets and public dances, with fairground
stalls and fireworks. City dwellers and
country people took part in the 14 July
celebrations with equal fervour, the former
enjoying a diverse range of entertainments
and the latter with their enthusiasm and
feelings of conviviality revitalised by
working the land. Even 14 July 1919, which
saw the victory parade take place in Paris
– the apotheosis of the united front
that had prevailed during the horror of
the First World War – ended in an
avalanche of entertainments. A Republican
celebration combined with a day of recreation
is the best definition of the French national
holiday now, in the early years of the
21st century, more than ever. The parade
of troops before the Head of State, broadcast
live on television, still draws television
viewers of all ages, and the little dances
led by orchestras perched on wooden platforms
put up the day before attract all those
who are pleased to see that the ceremonial
aspects do not interfere too much with
the celebrations. If celebrating demands
a set of collective memories and shared
hopes, then 14 July, buoyed by the impact
that the mythical history of year I of
freedom can have on the collective sensibilities
of the French, will be a day of national
celebration for a long time to come.
By Sahar Sana Siddique
University of Karachi
Department of Mass Communication
|
|
|
|
|